The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that states may enforce laws limiting participation in girls’ and women’s school sports based on biological sex, upholding statutes enacted in Idaho and West Virginia. The 6-3 decision marks the Court’s most significant ruling to date on transgender athletes and Title IX.
Writing for the majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh concluded that the challenged state laws do not violate either the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education.
Kavanaugh wrote that “[c]onsistent with Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause, we hold that the States may maintain women’s and girls’ sports for biological females. They may determine eligibility for women’s and girls’ sports based on biological sex. The Constitution and Title IX do not require an overhaul of women’s and girls’ sports throughout America.”
The cases, Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., were brought by transgender students who argued that the laws unlawfully discriminated against them by preventing their participation on girls’ teams. Lower federal courts had reached differing conclusions before the Supreme Court agreed to hear the consolidated cases.
In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, argued that the ruling improperly permits discrimination against transgender students and fails to adequately consider individual circumstances.
Sotomayor stated, “the majority extends great sympathy to those it favors: the young cisgender girls and women who play sports. I share that sympathy. Playing sports can lead to benefits that are immeasurable, and many are understandably invested in ensuring that competition stays fair and safe. Because the majority, however, inflicts a hardship on those it disfavors without giving them the fair and full opportunity the Constitution requires to litigate their contentions, I respectfully dissent.”
The decision is expected to influence similar laws already enacted in more than two dozen states and will likely shape future legal disputes involving transgender rights and school athletics.
Supporters of the ruling hailed it as a victory for women’s sports and state authority, while LGBTQ advocacy organizations criticized the decision, saying it will exclude transgender students from educational opportunities and athletic participation.
