On Thursday, January 8th, Manhattan Community Board 4 unanimously rejected a proposed casino and entertainment complex near Hudson Yards. The $12 billion project, a collaboration between Related Companies and Wynn Resorts, included three skyscrapers, a hotel, a public park, and casino. Although the board’s decision is advisory, it is seen as a significant setback for the developers as the proposal moves through the city’s land use review process.
The plan, positioned between West 30th and 33rd Streets, sparked strong opposition from community members and local leaders. Alan van Capelle, executive director of Friends of the High Line, voiced concerns about the project’s impact on the High Line’s green space and the neighborhood’s character. He argued that the area would be better suited for affordable housing, adding, “West Side New Yorkers are smart and savvy. They know a bad deal when they see one.”
City Council Member Erik Bottcher expressed skepticism regarding zoning changes required for the project. He highlighted the potential reduction in housing units and the need for a thorough public review. Many community members pointed out that the current proposal deviates from a 2009 agreement, which originally promised 5,700 housing units. The revised plan offers only 1,500 units, including 324 affordable units, a reduction that fueled local discontent.
Proponents of the casino complex, including representatives from Wynn Resorts, touted its potential economic benefits. They claimed the project could create 35,000 union construction jobs and more than 5,000 permanent positions. However, opponents remain unconvinced, citing concerns about the development’s long-term impact on the neighborhood. A petition opposing the project, titled “Protect the High Line at the Rail Yards,” has already garnered over 3,400 signatures.
Despite the advisory nature of the board’s vote, van Capelle believes it marks a crucial moment in the public review process. He urged Related Companies to withdraw their application and collaborate with the community to develop a more suitable plan. Natalie Ravitz, a spokesperson for Related, acknowledged the board’s feedback but insisted on moving forward, stating, “We welcome further input and remain committed to delivering jobs, housing, and community improvements.”
The casino proposal remains one of 11 competing bids across New York City for a limited number of state gaming licenses. The final decision will rest with the City Planning Commission and City Council following public hearings later this year.
